Search Results
Other Library

Search Conditions
Case: Insensitive  Construct: As a phrase  Hits Per Page: 5

Terms: Britain

123 File(s) Searched 48 Match(es) Found

Match(es) 31 to 35


  • File Name: ODP77ii.html
    Modified: 14 August 2015
    Title: On the Dictatorship of the Proletariat
  • 1 Occurence(s) of the search term BritainDescription:
    On the contrary, it needs to organize itself as a class open to individual mobility, a class which individuals may enter and leave in the course of historical developmen.It is true that there are indeed forms of organization specific to the bourgeoisie, 'corporative' forms, for example the employers' organizations (like the CNPF in France or the CBI in Britain), professional associations and bourgeois political partie.But this last type of organization functions more as a means of subjecting entire masses of the petty-bourgeoisie and working people to the political and ideological hegemony of the bourgeoisie than as a means of combining the fractions of the bourgeoisie in a co-operative relation and the bourgeois political parties themselves only constitute one aspect of the operation of the bourgeois political apparatus, with its parliamentary and municipal institutions, et

  • File Name: ODP77iii.html
    Modified: 14 August 2015
    Title: On the Dictatorship of the Proletariat
  • 2 Occurence(s) of the search term BritainDescription:
    And above all, as Grahame Lock explains, and as the reader will I think himself conclude from the texts contained here, the theoretical problems raised in this book bring into question by degrees the whole previous history of the international labour movement, the way in which this history is still a factor contributing to the present orientations and contradictions of this movement, and the way in which it is exercizing its influence on the interpretation and use of Marxist and Leninist principle.That is why, taking account of course of the considerable differences between the political situations of the different countries (France, Great Britain, Italy, Spain . . . but also -- why no.-- the USA, and even the Soviet Union and other socialist countries), and taking account in addition of the different, independent organizational forms which the working class of each country has constructed, I can only agree with Grahame Lock that this discussion does not concern one country and one party alon

  • File Name: OT73ii.html
    Modified: 28 February 2003
    Title: On Trotskyism - Part 2
  • 4 Occurence(s) of the search term BritainDescription:
    They did not seize i. Intimidated by the power of Britain, anxious to avoid a trial of strength, deluded about the democratic professions of faith of the English, and aware of the immense popularity of the 'National Liberation Front' (EAM) which they led, they hoped to accede to power by the 'normal' wide and level road and to economise on the 'Long March' via the precipitous maths of protracted war; the wide road led them to the precipic. That is why they signed the Lebanon agreement, the terms of which gave some EAM personalities unimportant portfolios in the Papandreou cabinet, and the Caserta agreement which made the British General Scobie commander-in-chief of the Resistance force

  • File Name: PC63.html
    Modified: 20 August 2002
    Title: Peaceful Coexistence . . . Diametrically Opposed Policies
  • 1 Occurence(s) of the search term BritainDescription:
    It is an outrageous betrayal of Marxism-Leninis.     Back in 1946, Comrade Mao Tse-tung differentiated between the two problems and explicitly stated that compromise between the Soviet Union and the United States, Britain and France on certain issues "does not require the people in the countries of the capitalist world to follow suit and make compromises at hom.The people in those countries will continue to wage different struggles in accordance with their different conditions."[1]     This is a correct Marxist-Leninist polic

  • File Name: PGL65.pdf
    Modified: 5 September 2006
    Title:
  • 11 Occurence(s) of the search term BritainDescription:
    This was another precious presentation gift made by the leaders of the CPSU to the U.S. imperialists in order to curry favour with the. Immediately afterwards in Moscow, the leadership of the CPSU signed the treaty on the partial halting of nuclear tests with the United States and Britain in open betrayal of the interests of the Soviet people, the people in the socialist camp including the Chinese people, and the peace-loving people of the world; there was a flurry of contacts between the Soviet Union and India; Khrushchov went to Yugoslavia for a ³vacation²; the Soviet press launched a frenzied anti-Chinese campaign; and so on and so fort.This whole train of events strikingly demonstrates that, disregarding everything, the leadership of the CPSU is allying with the imperialists, the reactionaries of all countries and the renegade Tito clique in order to oppose fraternal socialist countries and fraternal 99 Marxist-Leninist Partie


    [Search Again]
    • 48 file(s) matching your search criteria found.
    Narrow the search by searching 48 File(s)?

    Case:      Construct: