File Name: WDRCT63.pdf
Modified: 5 September 2006
Title:
15 Occurence(s) of the search term greatDescription:
Since we have already answered
their erroneous arguments on these questions in our editorials
entitled ³Workers of All Countries, Unite, Oppose
Our Common Enemy!², ³The Differences Between Comrade
Togliatti and Us² and ³Let Us Unite on the Basis of
the Moscow Declaration and the Moscow Statement², and
also in the editorial entitled ³Leninism and Modern Revisionism²
in the periodical Hongqi, there is no need here
to go over the same ground agai.
It is worth pointing out that in their speeches, reports
and articles, Thorez and the other comrades use a great
many words to distort the facts, confound right and wrong
and mislead the people, thus seeking to make the Chinese
Communist Party shoulder the responsibility for undermining
the unity of the international communist move
5
ment and creating a spli.They endlessly repeat that the
differences in the international communist movement
³were in particular the act of the Chinese comrades², and
that the differences arose because the Chinese comrades
³have not yet fundamentally accepted the theses of the
20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet
Union². They also allege that the greater the lapse of
time since the first and second Moscow Meetings of
the fraternal Parties, the more does the position of the
Chinese comrades ³diverge from the theses which they
had nevertheless approved and voted for².
Since Thorez and other comrades have brought up the
question of who is responsible for the emergence of differences
in the international communist movement, let
us discuss i
|